Toyota Harrier Vs Toyota Klugler

Tagged: Tara Elegance reveals modeling contest winner

This topic has 6 voices, contains 11 replies, and was last updated by ibshop 59 days ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

Author	Posts
Author	Posts
June 16, 2012 at 1:55 am #16262
carmaster	Could you compare these two cars good and week points.
June 16, 2012 at 5:14 pm #16318
saizinphyo	Toyota Harrier or Lexus RX [ First generation (XU10; 1998–2003) ] Engine – 2.2 (137 horsepower) 2.4 (157 horsepower) 3.0 (216 horsepower) Fuel consumption – FUEL KILLER Spare Parts – N/A Body Style – ** (rating) Interior Style – (rating) Engine Style – Rear-engined (Great) Kind – SUV (Sport Utility Vehicle) Price – (rating) Toyota Harrier is aimed for both ON-ROAD and OFF-ROAD comfort. If you worry about Fuel Consumption, just try to buy Lexus RX(Toyota Harrier) Hybrid. But, it is a little expensive. Toyota Kluger or Highlander First generation (XU20; 2000–2007) Engine – 2.4 (155 horsepower) 3.0 (220 horsepower) 3.3 (225 horsepower) Fuel Consumption – GOOD Spare Parts – N/A Body Style – ** (rating) Interior Style – * (rating) Engine Style – Front-engined (Very Bad) Kind – SUV (Sport Utility Vehicle) Price – *** (rating) The Highlander (or Kluger in Japan and Australia) shared a platform with its Lexus RX/Toyota Harrier cousin. Highlander aimed for ON-ROAD comfort with its unit body construction and independent rear suspension.
June 16, 2012 at 5:47 pm #16319
blackseacity	you can compare with this 2 modelMaker TOYOTA Chassis Type SUV Model KLUGER V Assembly Date 2004.4 Modification 2.4S FOUR G PACKAGE Chassis CBA-ACU25W-BRPGK(G) Price of a new vehicle 3066 Start selling date 2004.4 External dimensions (length x width x height) 469018251685MM Internal dimensions (length x width x height) 264515001220MM Wheelbase 2715MM The distance between the front wheels 1575MM The distance between the rear wheels 1555MM Clearance 180MM Unladen Weight 1700KG info_ref 4779 Engine Model 2AZ-FE Engine Type WATER COOLING IN-LINE 4-CYLINDER DOHC 16 VALVES Bore and stroke of plunger 88.5MM96.0MM Displacement 2362CC Compression ratio 9.6 Fuel Supply EFI (ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED FUEL INJECTION) Maximum power, hp/rpm 160PS(118KW)/5600RPM Maximum torque 22.5KG-M(221N-M)/4000RPM Supercharger NONE Fuel tank 72LITER Fuel UNLEADED REGULAR GASOLINE Fuel consumption (economy km on 1 litre) 10.6KM/LITER Power Steering POWER ASSIST EQUIPPED RACK & PINION Front suspension STRUT TYPE COIL SPRING Rear suspension STRUT TYPE COIL SPRING Front brakes VENTILATED DISK Rear brakes DISK Front wheels 215/70R16 99S Rear wheels 215/70R16 99S Turning radius 5.6M Seats 7 SEATERS Transmission 4AT Drive type FULL4WD LSD OPTION CVT — 1 gear 3.938 2 gear 2.194 3 gear 1.411 4 gear 1.019 5 gear (increased) — 6 gear (increased) — 7 gear (increased) — 8 gear (increased) — Reverse gear 3.141 reduction 1 gear — reduction 2 gear — Front foglamps STANDART Rear foglamps OPTION Xenon lamps STANDART Spotlight NONE Front spoiler NONE Rear spoiler STANDART Rear window cleaner STANDART Driver Airbag STANDART Passenger Airbag STANDART Side Airbags OPTION ABS STANDART Traction control NONE Front seat belts STANDART Limiter front seat safety belts STANDART Rear seat belts STANDART Cild seat belts STANDART Door stiffness STANDART Power Brakes STANDART Safeguard bow NONE EBD STANDART Car Security STANDART Additional safety equipment NONE Navigation OPTION Navigation media DVD Sound (CS&MD) AM/FM WITH RADIO MD PLAYER CD player CD CHANGER Conditioner FULL AUTOMATIC Power windows STANDART Central lock STANDART Moving steering column forward-backward NONE Moving steering column up and down STANDART Cruise control NONE Leather sheath steering wheel STANDART Leather seats OPTION Power front seats STANDART Power rear seats NONE Finishing panels ‘a timber’ NONE SR/MR OPTION Alloywheels 16 INCH STANDARD Expanding backseat DIVIDED UV Glass Protection STANDART Tinted windows STANDART… AND Maker TOYOTA Chassis Type SUV Model HARRIER Assembly Date 2004.4 Modification 240G Chassis CBA-ACU30W-AWPGK Price of a new vehicle 2614.5 Start selling date 2004.4 External dimensions (length x width x height) 473518451680MM Internal dimensions (length x width x height) 199015001210MM Wheelbase 2715MM The distance between the front wheels 1575MM The distance between the rear wheels 1560MM Clearance 185MM Unladen Weight 1600KG info_ref 208 Engine Model 2AZ-FE Engine Type WATER COOLING IN-LINE 4-CYLINDER DOHC Bore and stroke of plunger 88.5MM96.0MM Displacement 2362CC Compression ratio 9.6 Fuel Supply EFI (ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED FUEL INJECTION) Maximum power, hp/rpm 160PS(118KW)/5600RPM Maximum torque 22.5KG-M(221N-M)/4000RPM Supercharger NONE Fuel tank 72LITER Fuel UNLEADED REGULAR GASOLINE Fuel consumption (economy km on 1 litre) 11.0KM/LITER Power Steering POWER ASSIST EQUIPPED RACK & PINION Front suspension STRUT TYPE COIL SPRING Rear suspension STRUT TYPE COIL SPRING Front brakes VENTILATED DISK Rear brakes DISK Front wheels 225/65R17 Rear wheels 225/65R17 Turning radius 5.7M Seats 5 SEATERS Transmission 4AT Drive type FF LSD NONE CVT — 1 gear 3.943 2 gear 2.197 3 gear 1.413 4 gear 1.020 5 gear (increased) — 6 gear (increased) — 7 gear (increased) — 8 gear (increased) — Reverse gear 3.145 reduction 1 gear — reduction 2 gear — Front foglamps STANDART Rear foglamps OPTION Xenon lamps NONE Spotlight NONE Front spoiler NONE Rear spoiler STANDART Rear window cleaner STANDART Driver Airbag STANDART Passenger Airbag STANDART Side Airbags OPTION ABS STANDART Traction control NONE Front seat belts STANDART Limiter front seat safety belts STANDART Rear seat belts STANDART Cild seat belts STANDART Door stiffness STANDART Power Brakes STANDART Safeguard bow ADOPTION EBD STANDART Car Security STANDART Additional safety equipment NONE Navigation OPTION Navigation media DVD Sound (CS&MD) AM/FM RADIO CD player CD CHANGER Conditioner FULL AUTOMATIC Power windows STANDART Central lock STANDART Moving steering column forward-backward NONE Moving steering column up and down STANDART Cruise control NONE Leather sheath steering wheel STANDART Leather seats NONE Power front seats NONE Power rear seats NONE Finishing panels ‘a timber’ NONE SR/MR OPTION Alloywheels 17 INCH STANDARD Expanding backseat DIVIDED UV Glass Protection STANDART Tinted windows STANDART THIS 2 CAR IS 2004 G GRADE AND FOR ME I THINK THAT 2 KIND OF CAR IS MOSTLY SAME..
June 16, 2012 at 6:02 pm #16327
saizinphyo	This kind of comparison will not be necessary. Just compare these two cars in Myanmar WAY. A lot of car buyers and Dealers in Myanmar just check Engine Power, Body Style, Fuel Consumption, etc. They just compare the main points of the car. RIGHT?
June 16, 2012 at 8:08 pm #16329
carmaster	That’s right. If you are looking for a car use in Myanmar and compare within this two cars. What is your choice and why ?
June 16, 2012 at 8:55 pm #16331
saizinphyo	Both of the cars are good on their own. In my option, I will rater choose Toyota Harrier than Toyota Kluger because it is good for both ON-Road and OFF-Road Driving as it has Rear-Sided Engine which is good for rough Roads in Myanmar although its Fuel Consumption is a little bit more than Toyota Kluger. As for Toyota Kluger, it is aimed for ON-ROAD comfort on Smooth Road like Yangon-Mandalay New Road as it has Front-Sided Engine. If you buy, you should choose Toyota Harrier 2003 (not 1999) OR Toyota Kluger 2001.
June 24, 2012 at 10:17 pm #17652
carchitthu	What is better to choose Toyota Harrier 2003 than 1999? Generally latest model is better allbody kown. 1999 model CIF is 5000 US$ but 2003 model CIF is more than 15000US$ you must pay alotof TAX.Please discribe,compare within 1999 & 2003 model only car condition and specification.
June 25, 2012 at 6:14 pm #17761
ကားကား	2003 model Harrier will cost double price of 1999 model. I can only find the spec of 1999 Harrier. Fuel consumption not too bad. 10.6 liter for 100 km (3.0 2WD) 10.5 liter for 100 km (2.2 2WD) 1999 Harrier Engine Spec as below, source :http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota/harrier/1997_12/7309/ Displacement, cc 2994 Engine model 1MZ-FE Max.power (Net), kw(PS)/rpm 220 ps (161.81 kw) / 5800 rpm Max.torque(Net), Nm(kgm)/rpm 31.0 kgm (304.01 Nm) / 4400 rpm Power density 7.5 Engine type Water cooling V type6 cylinder DOHC Engine information VVT-i Fuel system EFI (electronic fuel injection) Turbocharger No Fuel type Unleaded premium gasoline LEV system (Low emission vehicle) No Compression ratio 10.5 Bore, mm 87.5 Stroke, mm 83 Final gear ratio Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km 10.6
June 25, 2012 at 6:43 pm #17764
saizinphyo	Just consider to buy Toyota Harrier 1999 2.2 4×4 Model. There is only few differences between 2003 and 1999 Harrier Model. The Fuel consumption of 1999 is a little more than 2003. The main difference is the Exterior and Interior Design. Not so many differences in Engine and Mechanical. That is why the Fuel Consumption of 2003 and 1999 becomes almost the same. Only Third generation 2009 Hybrid Model can terminate the BLACK Name called ”FUEL KILLER THE HARRIER” because its fuel consumption is so Tiny as much as Honda Insight.
June 25, 2012 at 8:12 pm #17765
ကားကား	Some information for those who want to buy 1999 Harrier. 1999 Harrier 2.2 2WD source: http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota/harrier/1997_12/7305/ 1999 Harrier 2.2 4WD source: http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota/harrier/1997_12/7307/ 1999 Harrier 3.0 2WD source: http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota/harrier/1997_12/7309/ 1999 Harrier 3.0 4WD source: http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota/harrier/1997_12/7313/ 100 km – 11.3 liter (3.0 4WD) 100 km – 10.9 liter (2.2 4WD) 100 km – 10.6 liter (3.0 2WD) 100 km – 10.5 liter (2.2 2WD)
July 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm #21228
carchitthu	All my friend,very sorry to delay reply.There are not too much different between Harrier 1999& 2003,but 2003 is double price than 1999.I decide to buy 1999 and rest money for Toyota Probox do Taxi,it can daily income.Not to buy only one car Harrier 2003.Thank for all.
March 22, 2013 at 9:54 am #84708
ibshop	Tara Elegance, a premium jeans company, selected its brand ambassadors in a runway event organized at Lewiston, Idaho on March 16, 2013 isabel marant shop. Brooke Urbaniak from Coeur d’Alene, Idaho won the first position on the overall scores category, and Nadina Mrkaljevic from Spokane, Washington won the first position on the judge’s score category. The Tara Elegance modeling contest was designed to identify promising new models and to offer these models the opportunity to work with fashion industry professionals wear isabel marant dicker boots. Of the 34 contestants who entered the initial round of contest, top 10 finalists were selected. The finalists underwent training by Fifth Element Talent Production prior to the runway event. The contestants were selected based on evaluation by a panel of judges, and a round of public voting. Brooke was ecstatic to win the contest and said, “I am really excited to win this contest.” After winning the first position in the Judge’s score category, Nadina Mrkaljevic wear isabel marant bobby sneaker said, “This is the best experience in my life.” Nadina aspires to be a medical doctor one day. Contestants were awarded more than $4000 worth of prizes and gifts. The event also included vocal and dance performances, and silent auction to raise fund for charities, Binaytara Foundation and Lewis Clark Valley Literacy Council wear isabel marant bekket sneaker. Tara’s Elegance combines culture, feminine sophistication, and current trend into their jeans to create luxurious premium jeans for women.